<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Street&#8217;s Disciple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Bigger Than Hip-Hop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:08:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J to the AAP</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html/comment-page-1#comment-13975</link>
		<dc:creator>J to the AAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13975</guid>
		<description>Mmm... i rate Speakerboxx/Love Below as Outkast&#039;s weakest moment (maybe next to Idelwild). Big Boi&#039;s half was nice, Dre&#039;s half was interesting but with little replay value, overall pretty good, but not by &#039;Kast standards. Big Boi+Andre &gt; Big Boi &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; Andre imo.

SD is mad underrated, but better than LAD or WTF? Not in my book. And Chaz raises a valid point, UGK definitley deserves a spot in the double album top 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230; i rate Speakerboxx/Love Below as Outkast&#8217;s weakest moment (maybe next to Idelwild). Big Boi&#8217;s half was nice, Dre&#8217;s half was interesting but with little replay value, overall pretty good, but not by &#8216;Kast standards. Big Boi+Andre &gt; Big Boi <i>or</i> Andre imo.</p>
<p>SD is mad underrated, but better than LAD or WTF? Not in my book. And Chaz raises a valid point, UGK definitley deserves a spot in the double album top 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html/comment-page-1#comment-13969</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13969</guid>
		<description>Good look. That Street&#039;s Disciple joint has been one of my favorite CD&#039;s since it came out.  &quot;Remember The Times&quot;, &quot;Theif&#039;s Theme&quot;, &quot;American Way&quot;, &quot;These Are Our Heroes&quot;, &quot;Live Now&quot;, &quot;Reason&quot; ...

Mad joints on this CD set. The fact that NaS&#039;s lazy ass* only did two video&#039;s 4 it kinda&#039; pisses me off but its always two or three with dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good look. That Street&#8217;s Disciple joint has been one of my favorite CD&#8217;s since it came out.  &#8220;Remember The Times&#8221;, &#8220;Theif&#8217;s Theme&#8221;, &#8220;American Way&#8221;, &#8220;These Are Our Heroes&#8221;, &#8220;Live Now&#8221;, &#8220;Reason&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>Mad joints on this CD set. The fact that NaS&#8217;s lazy ass* only did two video&#8217;s 4 it kinda&#8217; pisses me off but its always two or three with dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html/comment-page-1#comment-13917</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13917</guid>
		<description>Where would the new UGK fit in? That&#039;s a great ass double album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would the new UGK fit in? That&#8217;s a great ass double album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T2</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html/comment-page-1#comment-13896</link>
		<dc:creator>T2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13896</guid>
		<description>BP 2 had great tracks but it had way to much fillers to be called a classic same with  Streets Disciples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP 2 had great tracks but it had way to much fillers to be called a classic same with  Streets Disciples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erock LAzron</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html/comment-page-1#comment-13888</link>
		<dc:creator>Erock LAzron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13888</guid>
		<description>1) Wu Tang Forever
2) Speakerboxx
3) Street&#039;s Disciple
4) All Eyez on Me
5) Life After Death

Consistancy wise, thats the order I&#039;d put em&#039; in, but it&#039;s sacrilege to not even have Wu Tang Forever in your top 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Wu Tang Forever<br />
2) Speakerboxx<br />
3) Street&#8217;s Disciple<br />
4) All Eyez on Me<br />
5) Life After Death</p>
<p>Consistancy wise, thats the order I&#8217;d put em&#8217; in, but it&#8217;s sacrilege to not even have Wu Tang Forever in your top 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
