U.S. House Speaker explains that it’s not necessary to pass a resolution recognizing Michael Jackson as a music legend, because it might lead to the expression of contrarian views.
| 1. |
J to the AAP Says: July 10th, 2009 at 8:56 am Uhm… debating contrarian views, isn’t that kind of a vital part of a politician’s job? |
| 2. |
Probably Says: July 10th, 2009 at 12:10 pm I think what she means is she doesn’t want a bunch of people doing what Rep. King did last week, basically calling MJ a POS on the floor of Congress in order to score cheap political points. Its simply not worth the hassle and it would likely do nothing but anger MJ supporters and family. |
| 3. |
 July 10th, 2009 at 12:41 pm Now stop being so rational. It’s more fun to take it out of context. |
| 4. |
Mikey McFly Says: July 11th, 2009 at 11:50 am Well hey, in my book MJ is still the man and that’s all that matters |
| 5. |
Pat Says: July 11th, 2009 at 1:08 pm We don’t need Congress to tell us MJ is a legend. They have other things to focus on, and we have better ways to honor him. |
| 6. |
Dave Says: July 11th, 2009 at 11:17 pm Oh look, something else completely ridiculous for people to argue about. I can’t believe this stuff goes to congress. |
| 7. |
80sbby90skd Says: July 12th, 2009 at 10:24 pm I respect her reasoning. And really why does stuff like this have to go through Congress. |
| 8. |
Rezz909 Says: July 13th, 2009 at 2:43 pm Fuck MJ and Pelosi! |
| 9. |
enzo Says: July 14th, 2009 at 12:17 pm pretty funny how there was no evidence of him molesting, wasn’t convicted, but it’s just widely believed he fucked kids. |
